At the outset, it bears so you’re able to emphasize your personal rules facing absolute split up remains in force

At present, there is zero legal system significantly less than Philippine rules through which a Filipino may safer a separation decree upon his personal initiative. Properly, it’s the Court’s obligations to maintain for example coverage and apply the law because already stands till the passing of an enthusiastic amendatory rules about them.

Blog post twenty-six(2) of the Family Password try an exception to this rule toward nationality principle below Blog post 15 of one’s Civil Password.

Blog post twenty-six(2) is delivered into the meetings of your Joint Civil Password and you will Family members Law Committee (brand new Committee) to address the result from foreign separation and divorce decrees into the mixed marriages ranging from Filipinos and you can people from other countries. The fresh supply, given that in the first place worded, additionally the rationale for the inclusion, come in the new deliberations:

[Teacher Esteban B. Bautista ( Bautista)]is why updates, actually in establish legislation, is that Filipina partner can be allowed to remarry while the a lot of time due to the fact divorce holds true under the national rules off the newest spouse, that [Judge Alicia Sempio-Doing it yourself (Courtroom Do-it-yourself)] and [Fairness Leonor Ines-Luciano (Justice Luciano)] decided.

Immediately following further deliberation, [Fairness Ricardo C. Puno (Justice Puno)] suggested that they formulate the beds base to purchase significantly more than state. Courtroom Do-it-yourself and you can [Justice Eduardo P. Caguioa (Fairness Caguioa)] invented the beds base below:

In a mixed relationships between an excellent Filipino citizen and you will a foreigner, both capacitated to wed lower than Philippine laws, whether your foreigner would be to get a valid divorce proceedings overseas, capacitating him in order to remarry, the brand new Filipino companion should also have ability to remarry less than Philippine legislation.

Yet not, then deliberations show that the new Committee fundamentally solved so you can erase this new supply and you can postponed step up to pure divorce or separation is decided in the future legislation:

uruguayan post brudebestilling

To the Blog post [26(2)], [Fairness Jose B.L. Reyes (Fairness Reyes)] mentioned that it appears to discriminate against Filipinos, who are hitched to help you Filipinos, while the provision governs simply Filipinos hitched so you’re able to people from other countries.

Because the people in the newest Courtroom, ours ‘s the obligations to help you understand regulations; which responsibility will not hold inside it the power to determine what the legislation is when confronted with switching minutes, and therefore stamina, in turn, lays solely inside province regarding Congress

Fairness Puno recommended one, relative to Justice Caguioa’s see you to definitely grown they should create the newest Proposed Relatives Code just like the acceptable that one may and since they commonly touching into the divorce or separation that’s among large issues and are also leaving they in order to upcoming legislation, they omit Post 126(2)] temporarily or take it after they use up the problem of sheer breakup.


Bautista remarked that it is a matter of equity, justice and fairness that Article [26(2)] should be retained. On the point raised by Justice Reyes, Bautista opined that there is no unfairness in the case of a Filipino, who is married to a Filipino, because in the case of a Filipino who is married to a foreigner, the foreigner is already free, and yet the Filipino is still married to nobody. [Dean Bartolome S. Carale (Dean Carale)] added that if two Filipinos are married anywhere, they are both covered by the Philippine prohibitory laws because they are nationals of the Philippines. Justice Caguioa, however, pointed out that, in effect, there is preferential treatment in the case of Filipinos married to foreigners, since if the foreigner gets a divorce, the Filipino spouse also automatically gets a divorce. Dean Carale remarked that Article [26(2)] will in effect encourage Filipinos to marry foreigners. Bautista disagreed since it will be the foreigner rather than brand new Filipino, that will look for divorce case.

Justice Reyes remarked that this article is an implicit detection regarding international divorce proceedings, with which Justice Caguioa concurred. Bautista and you may [Professor Flerida Ruth P. Romero ( Romero)] realized that the article will simply coverage outstanding instances and you can special products and this there clearly was a good and you will substantial basis to make it a difference.

In which a wedding ranging from a great Filipino resident and you can a non-native are validly popular abroad and you will a divorce or separation is actually thereafter validly acquired overseas capacitating instance non-native in order to remarry, the fresh new Filipino partner will likewise have ability to remarry lower than Philippine laws.

Ir al contenido